EDIT (12/29) – This issue has been revisited and updated in this post:
http://www.internationalsaimoe.com/news/index.php/2009/12/30/revisiting-relegations-an-apology-and-new-statement/
—
If you’ve been noticing changes on the site throughout the day, I apologize for not reporting about it until now. There was a lot to do, and I’m glad I found the time to address everything, one page at a time. Now it’s time to review what I did.
Our Constitution has been ratified and can be found here. Also, the draft of the 2010 Annual Charter is now available for your preview; a few more tweaks will be needed before we can make it official. I also need to add more series and studios to the list; community members on the forums have been helping me out, and I appreciate it.
The biggest update to the Constitution before it became final was the eligibility requirements in Article III. The last version was not clear on characters who had both male and female forms. For characters like Natsuru from Kampfer or Ranma from Ranma 1/2, their female forms will be accepted, and their male halves will simply not exist in ISML. This distinction be important when determining series impact and significance, which is another eligibility requirement.
A clause regarding humanoid appearance and anthropomorphic qualities was added.
After much debate among the entire Staff, we have concluded that eligible characters for the Preliminary Rounds, Regular Season, and Postseason (i.e. Candidates and Contestants) must come from anime produced by a registered studio and distributed on a large commercial scale. What this results in is the removal of characters in the Tōhō Musō Kakyō OVA from Candidate-eligibility consideration in 2010. They are not out of the scene completely, though, because they are still Competitor-eligible, which means they could appear in our Exhibition Matches held throughout the year.
Because of this removal, we also have to void the results of the ISML Relegation Tournament held at the end of the 2009 season. The tournament was an entry point into the 2010 Preliminaries for Contestants who performed below-average in 2009, but Hakurei Reimu’s participation in it causes an inconsistency with our recent ruling. Simply removing her scores (while keeping the others) would not solve the problem either, since we can’t guarantee the final rankings would be the same. And without the time or resources to redo Relegation, we believe and have decided it’s best to drop Relegation altogether. Our Constitution and Charter have been updated to reflect this action and ensure that such an inconsistency will not happen again.
To summarize: Kawasumi Mai, Kurata Sayuri, Tsukimiya Ayu, and Misaka Mikoto must be nominated next week in order for them to have a chance at advancing to the Preliminary Rounds (and then the Regular Season). They no longer have automatic entry.
As for the remaining updates, you can see that new pages have been added to the menu bar at the top of the screen. The Rules page now has an FAQ that will steadily grow throughout the year. We understand that the Constitution and Charter are perhaps 11 pages of combined reading you might not necessarily have time for, so the FAQ will be crafted to explain the most important things in the most concise way when you’re in a hurry. However, please give our full-length documents a chance when you can, as they have been written to ensure that we do things thoroughly, properly, and precisely.
Our Staff page has been updated to make everyone’s assignments known .. and also to give us a chance to remember our good friend mokuhazushi, who did so much for our tournament but then had to leave to fight a battle with cancer, which he unfortunately lost earlier this year in August. We miss him a lot, and we have since been working hard in his memory to keep ISML running.
The voting arena is set up with our nominations page ready to go when New Year’s Day arrives. Thanks to everyone who helped beta-test the form earlier in the month. The form will open up at 0000 GMT, January 1 and last for 7 days. Tell everyone you know to get his or her nominations in!
Finally we were able to add Google Translate to our site. The drop-down menu on the right of the menu bar has a long list of available languages for you to explore our site with. The one obtrusive thing it does is create mouseover highlights on all the text. This would be fine for a light-background site, but instead we’re a dark-background site. I’ll continue investigating the script and try to work around that, but for now you can still enjoy ISML in exotic tongues such as Swahili and Icelandic.
Merry Christmas everyone, and we’re about one week away from the start of ISML 2010. The anticipation is rising. Thank you everyone for your patience and understanding.
Tags: charter, constitution, eligibility, layout, nominations, rules, staff, translation, voting

I have a question about the studio clause. In the spring, the Black Rock Shooter anime is coming out. The pilot was released in September. I don’t think the studio was mentioned, nor if the series would be DVD or TV. However, the pilot was released on DVD and Blu-Ray, and I’m pretty sure it was commercial (The director of Lucky Star, Haruhi and Kannagi is directing the project) I know it’s still early, but for 2011, will Black Rock Shooter, Dead Master and any other characters be able to participate?
The studio is Ordet, I believe, and it looks like the series would likely qualify for 2011.
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2009-08-22/hatsune-miku-anime-with-yutaka-yamamoto-confirmed-for-spring
But I don’t want to make promises this early. ^^; Qualification for 2011 will be based on the scale of 2010 release of the series and also if we set any specific rules for 2011 when the time gets closer.
The Sep 30 pilot by itself, however, would not be enough material.
I don’t quite understand and don’t know what are the reasons behind the thought of eliminating the candidates who have already won the relegation league. There is a well-accepted legal principle called “nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege”, i.e., you cannot create the rule/law to the disadvantage of the people. Especially in this case, I’m not sure how many people will read this news blog, so a lot of people would have neglected this change! That’s the disadvantage of the 4 girls. In addition, this also affects my (and perhaps others’) nomination plan.
My suggestion is, just let it go, and change this according to the constitution next year.
Our decision is part of a site-wide reform of our rules and policies. While we ran the 2009 tournament to the best of our abilities, it still had a lot of inconsistencies — oversights we have pledged to fix here in 2010. This unfortunately includes voiding Relegation.
Giving you the news in blog format is new for 2010, but we have always had a news page on the website since 2008 that is your source for the latest official updates. I will consider mentioning our change on the front page, too, just in case someone has missed it within the last week. Our nomination page also has a list of characters already qualified, and the 4 from Relegation are not on there.
Your comment comes at the same time we’re announcing an extension of nomination slots from 10 to 12, so I hope that is able to help your nomination planning in light of our decision on Relegations.
Thank you for your feedback.
[...] how tough it is for many of you to choose just 10 girls. Plus, we didn’t realize how our recent decision on voiding 2009 Relegation would make it that decision even tougher, since now you have 4 more girls to factor into your [...]
[...] a week ago, we made a decision regarding character eligibility: Restrictions were added such that characters from Touhou Project would not, in their current [...]